Hanging wind turbines under bridges could power up to 500 homes


    A clever way to harvest energy without using any extra land.


    In countries like Australia, where we have plenty of empty space, finding places to put wind turbines and solar panels isn’t a huge deal. But for all the nations out there with way more population density, working out how to generate renewable energy without taking up valuable land will be a big challenge in the coming decades.

    Placing wind turbines in ‘dead space’, such as underneath bridges, is a strategy that’s often been suggested, but no one’s ever tested how efficient it could be. Now researchers in the UK have used computer modelling to show for the first time that not only would wind turbines hanging below tall bridges be a viable way to harvest sustainable electricity, but that one of these installations would be capable of generating around half a megawatt of electricity, or enough to power around 450 to 500 homes.

    “This kind of installation would avoid the emission of 140 tonnes of CO2 per year, an amount that represents the depuration effect of about 7,200 trees,” Oscar Soto, a researcher on the project from Kingston University in London, told Spanish publication SINC.

    The team modelled the efficiency of different wind turbine options hanging from a viaduct bridge – a bridge that crosses only land, not water – in the Canary Islands off the coast of north-west Africa. The Canary Islands is a perfect theoretical testing ground for this type of technology, as it’s already invested heavily in renewable energy. In 2014, one of its islands became the first in the world to be powered entirely be wind and water – although to be fair, it only has around 10,000 residents to support.

    Still, the computer simulations showed that turbines hanging off the Juncal viaduct on Gran Canaria Island could definitely contribute to their electricity generation, without taking up precious space on the island.

    So what type of turbines should we be attached to our bridges? The researchers compared fluid dynamic simulations and found that multiple small turbines generate more electricity than large ones, and the best set-up in terms of energy harvesting would be 24 small turbines stationed under the Juncal viaduct. “The bigger the rotor surface, the more power can be extracted,” said Soto.

    But when you factor in the cost and difficulty of installing all of these small turbines, the benefits are actually cancelled out. In the end, the most efficient structure involves two identically sized turbines capable of generating a quarter of a megawatt each, which you can see in the artist’s recreation above. The results have beenpublished in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

    This isn’t the only project to focus on unused space to generate electricity – researchers are now installing solar farms on abandoned golf courses in Japan, and Japan has also built floating solar farms, which have an impressive 70 megawatt capacity. India is taking the same approach, with the construction of a 10 megawatt floating solar plant. And a recent US study revealed that placing solar panels in urban dead spaces, such as on top of buildings and on the side of highways, would provide enough electricity to power the whole of California five times over.

    So next time someone tells you that solar and wind power aren’t feasible alternatives to coal because they take up too much space, don’t believe them.

    Source : Science Alert